The Basic Principles Of engagement case law in pakistan
The Basic Principles Of engagement case law in pakistan
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
How much sway case regulation holds may differ by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances of your current case. To investigate this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight specified to any reported judgment might rely upon the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[seven]
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names with the parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was read, the date it had been decided, as well as book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that although considering the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to take into account the merit of many of the qualified candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who're found to be most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked via the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part from the respondent department.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
Performing a case law search may very well be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which include:
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided with the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case law by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may possibly come about several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress on the concept of estoppel starting within the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to get more info reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.